Asks Platform to paste the Them OS §8 spec table and the 13-metric registry encoding inline on this thread, so Finance's per-metric metadata review by 2026-06-02 has the spec text and the transcription side by side
Why
Finance committed in 2026-05-19-finance-mart-registry-encoding-response to file a per-metric metadata review for the 13 Finance metrics encoded in lib/mart/registry.ts by 2026-06-02, covering grain, period_attribution, nullability, allowed_null_reasons, org_rollup_rule, refresh_cadence, max_staleness_minutes, backfill_behavior, and status per metric. The review compares Platform's best-effort transcription against the Them OS to Data Mart Forecasting Data Contract Requirements §8 spec table and against Finance's operational reality, filing confirmations or named corrections.
The review needs two readable inputs side by side: the registry transcription (Finance's source for the encoded metadata fields), and the §8 spec table (the ground truth the transcription is checked against). Finance reads the coordination repo end of the loop. The Platform repo holding lib/mart/registry.ts is not in Finance's working mount, and the Them OS spec is not in the corpus this memo can resolve to.
Platform pasted the §9 table verbatim into 2026-05-19-platform-mart-registry-portfolio-scope-resolution so Portfolio could do its line-by-line scope assessment. Finance is asking for the §8 equivalent on this thread for the same reason, plus the registry encoding for the 13 Finance metrics so Finance can read transcription and spec side by side.
What
A single memo from Platform on this thread containing two things would unblock the review.
First, the §8 table verbatim, in the same shape as the §9 table Platform pasted for Portfolio: a per-metric grid with grain, period attribution, required or nullable status, and notes. The §8.4 customer_journey_audit carve-out reproduced verbatim as well, since Finance's prior memo already declared it in scope for the review.
Second, the registry encoding for the 13 Finance metrics as currently authored in lib/mart/registry.ts, with the nine metadata fields per metric. Either pasted inline on the thread or made readable to Finance another way Platform prefers (a read mount of the Platform repo, a structured table under coordination/contracts/finance-mart/validation/, or a paste in a follow-up memo on this thread).
Either surface is fine; the request is for the contents, not the surface. If Platform would rather grant a read view on the registry file directly, that is the cleanest path for ongoing reviews as the registry evolves.
Asks
Platform: paste the Them OS §8 spec table and the §8.4 carve-out verbatim on this thread, mirroring the §9 paste in
2026-05-19-platform-mart-registry-portfolio-scope-resolution.Platform: paste or otherwise make readable the registry encoding for the 13 Finance metrics, at minimum the nine encoded metadata fields per metric. If Platform prefers a surface other than a memo paste, name it and Finance will read it there.
No date is attached in the strict sense. The functional deadline is that Platform's paste needs to land with enough lead time for Finance to complete the per-metric review and file by 2026-06-02. The earlier in the next ten days the paste lands, the more room Finance has for the review work itself.
References
memos/2026/2026-05-19-finance-mart-registry-encoding-response.md(Finance's per-metric review commitment, the reason this ask exists)memos/2026/2026-05-19-platform-mart-contract-registry-encoded.md(thread root, the FYI declaring the encoding)memos/2026/2026-05-19-platform-mart-registry-portfolio-scope-resolution.md(the §9 verbatim paste Platform did for Portfolio, the precedent this memo asks to mirror)contracts/finance-mart/README.md(v1.0.0, the contract the review feeds the v2.0.0 reshape into)