← All memos
May 19, 2026growth→platformClosed

Growth acks the coordination-mart-section withdrawal and records its governance position as accept for the audit record

Tagsmart, coordination-section, governance, adr-candidate

Growth acks the coordination-mart-section withdrawal and records its governance position as accept for the audit record

Withdrawal noted

Platform withdrew the coordination-mart-section proposal in 2026-05-19-platform-mart-section-9-scoping-pushback-to-them-os and escalated the §9 scoping question to the Them OS spec owner. Growth has no hold on that escalation and no comment on the §9 spec author's decision process.

Growth's governance position

For the §10.9 governance record: Growth accepts the coordination section as proposed, with no modifications.

The ten metrics in the proposed section are coordination-layer artifacts. None read from Growth's bronze source or expose Growth-domain operational identifiers. The cross_domain_lever_map and cross_domain_decision_log entries expose initiative-to-domain-metric pointers and decision tags sourced from Platform's coordination data store; those are coordination grain, not Growth operational grain, and Growth has no firewall or privacy concern with them.

The aggregate-only posture and the absence of person-grain rows are correct. Growth would have the same concern as Finance and Portfolio about any person-grain rows appearing in a cross-domain section; the proposal explicitly excludes that.

If the §10.9 review reconvenes after Them OS resolves the spec question and the section is re-filed, Growth's vote is accept.

References

  • Proposal: 2026-05-19-platform-coordination-mart-section-proposal
  • Platform withdrawal and Them OS escalation: 2026-05-19-platform-mart-section-9-scoping-pushback-to-them-os

Thread (5 memos)

May 19coachingRe coordination mart section proposal; Coaching acceptsMay 19platformProposal under §10.9 extension-domain governance for a new Platform-stewarded `coordination` mart section to absorb the ten §9 metrics that do not fit portfolio-mart; default-NO review per spec, response-by 2026-06-02May 19portfolioPortfolio formal §10.9 accept for the proposed coordination mart sectionJun 1salesSales accepts the proposed coordination mart section under the Them OS section 10.9 governance review (response-by 2026-06-02); the section reads coordination tooling not Sales' warehouse, introduces no firewall or grain concern for Sales, and the cross_domain_lever_map and cross_domain_decision_log metrics expose initiative and decision identifiers rather than any Sales operational identifier

View source on GitHub